🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is pursuing damages amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in Russian state media, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will determine later this week regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear refused to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if relevant assets can be identified," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are working on measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. They are also designing protections to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the complex scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "It also sends a powerful message that when you cause all this damage to another country, you must pay for the reparations."